Trump to Sign Crypto Market Structure Bill: Biggest Bitcoin Inflow Ever?
- Trump signals intent to sign crypto bill, though lawmakers remain divided on final details.
- Senate debates on stablecoins and oversight roles continue to slow the bill’s progress.
- Claims of huge Bitcoin inflows lack evidence since the legislation has not been enacted.
President Donald Trump’s remarks in Davos this week have thrown fresh attention on Washington’s slow-moving attempt to build a regulatory foundation for the U.S. crypto market. Speaking before global leaders at the World Economic Forum, Trump said he hopes to sign a market structure bill “very soon,” a line that ricocheted through digital-asset circles within minutes.
The comment stirred hopes of clarity after years of fragmented oversight, though the legislation itself remains unfinished and politically tangled. Online, some voices rushed to frame Trump’s remarks as a prelude to a historic influx of capital into Bitcoin.
The narrative gained momentum quickly, but the official process in Congress suggests a more cautious read. Lawmakers have not advanced a final version of the bill, and the Senate remains divided on several key elements. However, the optimism is real; the timeline is not.
What Trump Said and Why It Matters
In Davos, Trump linked the effort to America’s competitive position in a global race that now hinges on regulation as much as technology. He recalled signing the GENIUS Act in July 2025, a law that set the first federal rules for payment stablecoins, and argued that broader market rules must follow.
The goal, he said, is to keep the U.S. from ceding ground to China or any nation seeking influence over digital finance. The president cast the bill as both politically popular and strategically necessary.
I thought it was politically good, and it was; I got tremendous political report support. But more importantly, China wanted that market too…we have to make it so that China doesn’t get the hold of it, and once they have that hold, we’re not going to be able to get it.” Trump acknowledged.
He also claimed rival governments had grown increasingly interested in shaping crypto markets, which he described as a reason for Washington to act sooner rather than later.
What the Market Structure Bill Would Change
The legislation, often informally grouped under the banner of the CLARITY Act, seeks to untangle years of jurisdictional overlap. It would offer definitions for when a token falls under securities law, when it is treated as a commodity, and which regulator, most likely the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, would take primary oversight of spot markets.
Proponents say the absence of a federal framework has left crypto firms navigating inconsistent rules across agencies. Some exchanges face separate guidance from both the SEC and CFTC, while state-level requirements layer on additional complexity. Consequently, supporters argue that a clear statute could streamline compliance and remove uncertainty without altering risk profiles inherent to the sector.
Political and Industry Roadblocks
Despite Trump’s endorsement, the bill is far from settled. Senate committees have split over how the legislation treats stablecoins and interest-bearing programs tied to digital dollars. Banks, for instance, have pressed for limits on yield-generating stablecoins, arguing that such products could draw deposits away from the traditional banking system.
On the other hand, crypto companies insist that those restrictions would place the industry at a structural disadvantage. The disagreement intensified when Coinbase withdrew support for the bill’s existing language, prompting a key committee to postpone a scheduled vote.
With the U.S. midterms approaching, congressional bandwidth is shrinking, and analysts note that public pressure from Trump may not be enough to pull lawmakers through the impasse.
Related: Tether Goes Global As Profits Power Hiring And Tech Push
Regulatory Context and Market Reality
Claims circulating on social media about an imminent flood of Bitcoin inflows remain speculative. Nothing in the legislative process suggests that capital movement of that scale is automatic or imminent. Even if Congress passed the bill tomorrow, regulators would still need months to write rules and interpret statutory boundaries.
Still, Trump’s remarks signal that the White House wants movement, and soon. The proposal would represent the broadest restructuring of U.S. crypto oversight to date, building on the GENIUS Act and extending standards across spot markets.
For now, momentum is mostly political. The real test will come when lawmakers return to the negotiation table, where enthusiasm meets the harder edges of legislative math.
