• 04 November, 2024
Features

Ethereum Classic Review: Decentralization and Immutability

Ethereum Classic Review: Decentralization and Immutability

Ethereum Classic is a decentralized platform based on the blockchain that appeared after a significant event in the world of cryptocurrencies. The token was introduced after a philosophical debate within the Ethereum based community, following the hackers attack on DAO in 2016. Ethereum Classic (ETC) continues to uphold the principles of the Ethereum chain before the contentious split: it is immutable and extremely decentralized.

What is Ethereum Classic?

Ethereum Classic (ETC) is a decentralized application (dApps) and smart contracts platform based on open-source blockchain. It resembles Ethereum in many ways, primarily because both emerged from the same codebase. But one of the most important forks happened in 2016, after the DAO hack, resulting in the formation of Ethereum Classic. While Ethereum (ETH) rewound its blockchain to cover the hack, Ethereum Classic decided to maintain the genesis blockchain intact.

The Ethereum Classic community believes in the principle of “code is law,” meaning that the blockchain should be immutable. This philosophy has drawn a loyal group of users who value decentralization and trustless systems. ETC continues to use the proof-of-work (PoW) consensus mechanism, where miners validate transactions and secure the network.

The Ethereum Classic community views the idea that “code is law,” therefore the blockchain should not be altered. This has attracted a core set of users who appreciate decentralization and systems that do not require any external validation. To date, ETC considers the proof-of-work (PoW) consensus algorithm; miners authenticate transactions and support network security.

The DAO Hack and the Fork

The Ethereum network underwent a significant shift back in 2016 by a hack of the DAO. The decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) had crowdsourced $150 million. Nevertheless, hackers discovered a loophole in the program and stole $50m worth of Ether from the project. The Ethereum community faced a difficult decision: whether to resolve the hack by roll backing the blockchain to refund the money or let it be?

A vote was conducted, and a majority of those present voted in favor of forking the blockchain to ‘recover’ the lost funds. This action resulted in formation of Ethereum (ETH) which adapted changes, while Ethereum Classic (ETC) on the other hand, stuck to the principle of decentralization by remaining on the original chain. This event cemented Ethereum Classic to the unaltered blockchain no matter the financial implications to the community.

The fork also exposed deeper philosophical differences within the blockchain community. For Ethereum Classic, decentralization and censorship resistance were paramount, while Ethereum prioritized adaptability and security in the face of adversity.

Ethereum Classic Rises Amid ETH ETF Approval, Eyes on Halving

Ethereum Classic vs. Ethereum

Despite the fact that Ethereum Classic and Ethereum are built on the same underlying technology, there are differences in terms of principles and functions. Ethereum has become the most successful platform for deploying smart contracts and decentralized applications and continues to benefit from a large developer following and continuous advances. As opposed to this, ETC has always emphasized on keeping up with the true meaning of decentralization and how the blockchain is completely resistant to alteration.

Consensus mechanism is one of the most notable differences each blockchain uses. Ethereum’s transition to proof of stake took place in September 2022 as part of the upgrade referred to as “The Merge”. This change greatly cut Ethereum’s energy consumption and improved its scalability. Yet, Ethereum Classic utilizes the proof of work (PoW) algorithm under which miners perform the primary functions of network protection.

The PoW model of Ethereum Classic appeals to miners who believe that this consensus mechanism is more secure and decentralized than PoS. PoW requires significant computational resources, which makes it more difficult for attackers to compromise the network. The increase in Ethereum Classic’s hash rate following Ethereum’s transition to PoS demonstrates that many miners prefer the PoW system.

The Significance of Immutability

Ethereum Classic’s emphasis on the blockchain’s ability to be untampered retains a talent base of ‘traditionalist’ blockchain supporters. Maintaining this chain’s history makes Ethereum Classic to be favorable for users and developers who have an importance of security, decentralization and censorship.

However, this rigidity also has its difficulties. In the Ethereum Classic blockchain, it has been quite challenging to implement Layer upgrades that have been adopted by Ethereum. This ability to produce changes shows that Ethereum is open to development in order to acquire scale and security. For instance, Ethereum has integrated layer-2 scaling solutions and the latest Dencun upgrade to solve its scalability problems, but the same problem affects Ethereum Classic.

Proof of Work vs. Proof of Stake

The controversy about PoW and PoS remains one of the major topics in the field of blockchain technology. The choice Ethereum Classic made to stick with PoW has ensured that it stays in synergy with other PoW blockchains such as Bitcoin. Some of the benefits of PoW include better decentralization and security, according to the proponents of PoW because much computing power is used to validate transactions and support the platform.

Ethereum’s transition to PoS, on the other hand, offers several benefits. PoS uses far less energy than PoW and enables greater scalability by allowing more transactions to be processed. It also reduces the risk of a 51% attack, as attackers would need to acquire and stake a large portion of the network’s tokens, making such an attack costly and difficult.

Despite the differences, both systems have their pros and cons. PoW offers proven security and decentralization, but at the cost of high energy consumption. PoS, meanwhile, offers greater efficiency and scalability, but some argue that it could lead to centralization if a small group of stakeholders control a significant portion of the tokens.

Review on Ethereum: Revolutionizing Smart Contracts 

Ethereum Classic in the Crypto Market

Ethereum Classic is still one of the important players in the cryptocurrency market. Despite the relatively small market cap compared to Ethereum, ETC is always among the top 30. ETH market capitalization is currently $372 billion while that of Ethereum Classic is $4.2 billion thus making it 90 times more than that of Ethereum.

ETC like most other altcoins tends to be more volatile than Ethereum and Bitcoin and its price movements coincide with those of altcoins. This is among the most revered among miners and steady, longer-term investors who have not lost faith in its founding postulates of decentralization and immutability. Ethereum Classic’s infallible commitment to the core blockchain principles makes it remain relevant in addressing the needs of a committed core of developers and users.

Despite its smaller market cap, Ethereum Classic continues to be an important player within the context of the blockchain. Ethereum Classic’s trustless and decentralized nature ensures its continued relevance.

Conclusion

With more applications for cryptocurrencies emerging, participants might find value in being part of the Ethereum Classic project for its core values. Whether it will solve its scaling problems, this remains to be seen but Ethereum Classic has a place in the hall of great development of blockchain.

Comprehensive Review of Singapore's Digital Asset Regulation
Read Previous

Comprehensive Review of Singapore's Digital Asset Regulation

Australia's New Crypto Licensing Rules: What to Know
Read Next

Australia's New Crypto Licensing Rules: What to Know